Elements of Axionomy

Here, Adrien Morel models the human faculty of Norm by reorganising the entire Freudian corpus concerning neuroses within the framework of clinical anthroponomy, through faces, phases and axes.

All its notions, from transference to fantasy, from repression to libido, and so on, without exception, are brought back to inclusions or integrations of axiodiceic units and identities — which, however, Freud himself had not identified as such.

The Freudian corpus gains from this conversion an undeniable and spectacular epistemic added value, while anthroponomy receives the support of an experimental clinical verification.
And what support it is! It was Sigmund Freud himself who distinguished all the notions and mechanisms taken up by Adrien Morel. Morel simply delimits and defines them within the framework of his model, which is thereby verified, reinforced and validated by the discoverer of the unconscious. The result is, at last, a complete, coherent and operational version of clinical anthroponomy.
Complete does not mean finished. Quite the opposite: everything is beginning. Now that the human sciences have finally emerged, every problematisation of the human will benefit from an epistemological modelling. Everything remains to be done, but the framework is in place, making possible what still remains to be done.
 

Provided, of course, that our fellow humans take hold of it. That is where the difficulty lies. Human beings are so deeply attached to their archaic ideologies. Even when knowledge is their profession, in the twenty-first century. Even in this France that claims to be rationalist and universalist, while deploying conceptions of the rational, the universal and the transcendent that are as archaic as they are ideological.